Papers
Export 11 results:
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is E [Clear All Filters]
. (2019). A convolutional neural network trained with dermoscopic images performed on par with 145 dermatologists in a clinical melanoma image classification task. European Journal Of Cancer, 111, 148 - 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.02.005
. (2019). A convolutional neural network trained with dermoscopic images performed on par with 145 dermatologists in a clinical melanoma image classification task. European Journal Of Cancer, 111, 148 - 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.02.005
. (2019). A convolutional neural network trained with dermoscopic images performed on par with 145 dermatologists in a clinical melanoma image classification task. European Journal Of Cancer, 111, 148 - 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.02.005
. (2019). Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. European Journal Of Cancer, 113, 47 - 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001
. (2019). Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. European Journal Of Cancer, 113, 47 - 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001
. (2019). Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. European Journal Of Cancer, 113, 47 - 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001
. (2019). Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. European Journal Of Cancer, 113, 47 - 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001
. (2019). Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. European Journal Of Cancer, 113, 47 - 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001
. (2019). Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. European Journal Of Cancer, 113, 47 - 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001
. (2019). The future of human-AI collaboration: A taxonomy of design knowledge for hybrid intelligence systems. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Retrieved de https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/publications/254994
. (2019). Hybrid Intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(5), 637 - 643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00595-2
. (2019). The present and future of deep learning in radiology. European Journal Of Radiology, 114, 14 - 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.038
. (2020). Implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Roadmap for Business Model Innovation. Ai, 1, 180–191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai1020011
. (2020). Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration. Information And Management, 57, 103174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103174
. (2020). Think with me, or think for me? On the future role of artificial intelligence in marketing strategy formulation. The Tqm Journal, ahead-of-p. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0303
. (2020). Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims. 1–9. Retrieved de http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.07213
. (2021). Hybrid intelligence in business networks. Electronic Markets. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00481-4
Ebel2021_Article_HybridIntelligenceInBusinessNe.pdf (605.72 KB). (2024). Editorial: Sharing work with AI: introduction to the special issue on the futures of work in the age of intelligent machines. Information Technology & People, 37(7), 2353 - 2356. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-12-2024-994