@article {Reid-musson2020,
	title = {Feminist economic geography and the future of work},
	journal = {EPA: Economy and Space},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {1{\textendash}12},
	keywords = {corresponding author, department of geography, emily reid-musson, feminist economic geography, memorial university of newfoundland, newfoundland and labrador a1c, social reproduction, subjectivity, technology, work},
	doi = {10.1177/0308518X20947101},
	author = {Reid-musson, Emily and Cockayne, Daniel and Frederiksen, Lia and Worth, Nancy}
}
@booklet {Grimshaw2020,
	title = {International organisations and the future of work: How new technologies and inequality shaped the narratives in 2019},
	howpublished = {Journal of Industrial Relations},
	volume = {62},
	number = {3},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {477{\textendash}507},
	abstract = {In a critical review of seven prominent flagship reports from five international organisations {\textendash} the International Labour Organization (ILO), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and World Bank {\textendash} this article explores how the policy narratives set out during 2019 and early 2020 have characterised the major future of work challenges associated with new technologies and inequality. It identifies some similarities in viewpoints, including about the unevenness of job changes caused by new technologies and about the declining labour income share, a key measure of inequality. However, there are major points of differentiation. The ILO, OECD and UNDP express serious concerns about the interaction between new technologies and growing inequalities, on the one hand, and a rise in precarious work, concentration of corporate power and erosion of labour bargaining power on the other. Also, UNIDO emphasises the inequalities in technological capacities between developed and developing countries, which make it difficult for markets to distribute the gains from growth evenly. While the World Bank makes some concessions, it remains less open to real-world heterodox evidence about how labour markets function in society. The World Bank aside, there is a growing consensus that labour institutions around the world need to be reinvigorated in order to respond to the challenges facing the future of work.},
	keywords = {future of work, Inequality, International Labour Organization, international organisations, labour income share, new technologies},
	issn = {14729296},
	doi = {10.1177/0022185620913129},
	author = {Grimshaw, Damian}
}
@article {2018,
	title = {Robots and Organization Studies: Why Robots Might Not Want to Steal Your Job},
	journal = {Organization Studies},
	year = {2018},
	month = {04/2018},
	pages = {017084061876556},
	edition = {2},
	abstract = {A number of recent high-profile studies of robotics and artificial intelligence (or AI) in economics and sociology have predicted that many jobs will soon disappear due to automation, with few new ones replacing them. While techno-optimists and techno-pessimists contest whether a jobless future is a positive development or not, this paper points to the elephant in the room. Despite successive waves of computerization (including advanced machine learning), jobs have not disappeared. And probably won{\textquoteright}t in the near future. To explain why, some basic insights from organization studies can make a contribution. I propose the concept of {\textquoteright}bounded automation{\textquoteright} to demonstrate how organizational forces mould the application of technology in the employment sector. If work does not vanish in the age of AI, then poorly paid jobs will most certainly proliferate, I argue. Finally, a case is made for the scholarly community to engage with wider social justice concerns. This I term public organization studies.},
	keywords = {artificial intelligence, bounded automation, neoliberalism, public organization studies, Robotics, unemployment, work},
	issn = {0170-8406},
	doi = {10.1177/0170840618765568},
	url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0170840618765568},
	author = {Fleming, Peter}
}
